Legal Opinion

Sanders v. Plant

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 23, 1947No. 4-8241PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The facts out of which this litigation arose are stated in the opinion on a former appeal and will not be repeated, Plant v. Sanders, 209 Ark. 108,189 S.W.2d 720. As appears from that opinion, there was involved the validity of the sale of the lands there described for the non-payment of the taxes due thereon for the year 1930, which sale had been confirmed by the state. The opinion in that case sustained the title of Plant, who had purchased from the state, as to certain of the lands, but held the sale of others void because of defective descriptions.

Upon the remand of the cause Mrs. Louise…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crill v. HudsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1903
  2. Towell v. EtterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1900
  3. Mobbs v. BurrowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  4. Plant v. SandersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  5. Bracken v. HensonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bryant v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1954
  2. Rubin Bryant and Andrew Kennedy v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Company, a Corporation, and United States Gypsum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
  3. Anderson-Tully Co. v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
  4. Burbridge v. Bradley Lumber Co. of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  5. Greif Bros. Cooperage Corp. v. United States Gypsum Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API