Legal Opinion

State v. Novak

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1966No. 36309PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.

The defendant, Stephen T. Novak, was convicted of soliciting, proposing, or agreeing to receive a bribe in violation of section 28-708, R. R. S. 1943. His motion for new trial was overruled and he has appealed.

The case arose out of an application to rezone a tract of land at Eighty-first Street and Farnam Drive in Omaha, Nebraska. The defendant was a member of the city council and voted for the rezoning. The State’s theory of the case is that the defendant, in conspiracy with others, solicited, proposed, and agreed to receive a bribe in the amount of $10',000 for a favorable vote on the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cramer v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Hoffman v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  3. State v. AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Smith v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Winkelmann v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. CostelloNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. McIntyreNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. ReichelNebraska Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API