State v. Novak
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.
The defendant, Stephen T. Novak, was convicted of soliciting, proposing, or agreeing to receive a bribe in violation of section 28-708, R. R. S. 1943. His motion for new trial was overruled and he has appealed.
The case arose out of an application to rezone a tract of land at Eighty-first Street and Farnam Drive in Omaha, Nebraska. The defendant was a member of the city council and voted for the rezoning. The State’s theory of the case is that the defendant, in conspiracy with others, solicited, proposed, and agreed to receive a bribe in the amount of $10',000 for a favorable vote on the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cramer v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
- Hoffman v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
- State v. AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1966
- Smith v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
- Winkelmann v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. CostelloNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. McIntyreNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. ReichelNebraska Supreme Court · 1969