Legal Opinion

State v. Adams

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1966No. 36307PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.

The defendant, Ernest A. Adams, was convicted of soliciting, proposing, or agreeing to receive a bribe in violation of section 28-708, R. R. S. 1943. His motion for new trial was- overruled and he has appealed.

This case arose out of an application to rezone a tract of land at Eighty-first Street and Farnam Drive in Omaha, Nebraska. The application was first presented to the planning board and then submitted to the city council. The defendant was a member of the city council and voted for the rezoning. The State’s theory of the case is that the defendant, in conspiracy with others, solicited,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. Julius L. EchelesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
  2. Bartley v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Myers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  4. Sedlacek v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Cowan v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1942

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. CoppleNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. PiskorskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. BeermannNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. CoomesNebraska Supreme Court · 2021
  5. State v. LastNebraska Supreme Court · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API