Legal Opinion

Burns v. Lupis

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided April 3, 2024No. 3:23-cv-00023Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT DENNY J. BURNS, ) CASE NO. 3:23-cv-23 (KAD) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) FRANCESCO LUPIS, et al., ) APRIL 3, 2024 Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 28) Kari A. Dooley, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Denny J. Burns (“Burns”) filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Following initial review, only Eighth Amendment claims for deliberate indifference to medical needs against Dr. Lupis and Regional Chief Operating Officer (“RCOO”) Shea (“Defendants”) remain. See ECF No.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Ben Gary Triestman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API