Roman Nose v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILDEA, Chief Justice.
The question presented in this case is whether the postconviction court erred by resentencing respondent Tony Allen Roman Nose to life with the possibility of release after 30 years based on a legal conclusion that the rule announced in Miller v. Alabama, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012), applies retroactively to a juvenile whose sentence of life in prison without the possibility of release (LWOR) became final before the Miller rule was announced. Because the postconviction court’s legal conclusion is in direct conflict with Chambers v. State, 831…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Prentis Cordell Jackson v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Kim Thul Ouk v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Michael Wayne v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Richard Ellis HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- LaMonte Rydell Martin v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.