Legal Opinion

Kim Thul Ouk v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 11, 2014No. A13-1959PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

In 1992, a jury found then-15-year-old appellant Kim Thul Ouk guilty of two counts of first-degree murder and two *699counts of attempted first-degree murder. Each count involved a separate victim. The district court imposed two mandatory life sentences with the possibility of release and two 15-year sentences. In June 2013 Ouk filed a postconviction motion to correct his sentence, citing Miller v. Alabama, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 2475, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012), in which the United States Supreme Court held that, as applied to juveniles, sentencing schemes mandating life…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. State v. VangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  4. Chambers v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  5. Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wyatt L. Bear CloudWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. Anderson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State of Minnesota v. Forrest Grant NoggleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  4. State v. TranHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. State of Minnesota v. Jason Ryan WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API