Kim Thul Ouk v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Justice.
In 1992, a jury found then-15-year-old appellant Kim Thul Ouk guilty of two counts of first-degree murder and two *699counts of attempted first-degree murder. Each count involved a separate victim. The district court imposed two mandatory life sentences with the possibility of release and two 15-year sentences. In June 2013 Ouk filed a postconviction motion to correct his sentence, citing Miller v. Alabama, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 2475, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012), in which the United States Supreme Court held that, as applied to juveniles, sentencing schemes mandating life…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- State v. VangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Chambers v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wyatt L. Bear CloudWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. Anderson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- State of Minnesota v. Forrest Grant NoggleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- State v. TranHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Jason Ryan WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.