Legal Opinion
State v. Bartkowski
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 10, 1980No. Crim. 690PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PEDERSON, Justice.
This appeal is from a judgment upon conviction by a jury of the Class B felony, possession of a hallucinogenic drug with intent to deliver (§§ 19-03.l-05(4)(7), 19-03.1-23(l)(b), and 12.1-32-01(2), NDCC). Bartkowski presents three issues: (1) Did the trial court err in limiting his cross-examination of one of the State’s witnesses? (2) Is the evidence sufficient to sustain the conviction? (3) Did the trial court commit prejudicial error in failing to require a special verdict on the question of entrapment? We find no prejudicial error. The evidence is sufficient to support…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Brookhart v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. SheldonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. TriebNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. MehralianNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. HelgesonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.