Legal Opinion
Ozark Pipe Line Corporation v. Decker
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 27, 1929No. 8214, 8215PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MUNGER, District Judge.
This cause was brought to this court both by appeal and by error. The appeal is the proper proceeding, and the writ of error will be dismissed.
This was an action at law against appellant, hereafter called defendant, for damages claimed to have been sustained by appellee, hereafter called plaintiff, because of oil that - escaped from a pipe line operated by the defendant. A jury was waived by a stipulation in writing. A judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant assigns as error that the court refused findings of fact which it had requested, but,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- St. Louis v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Norris v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Lehnen v. DicksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Insurance Co. v. FolsomSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Federal Intermediate Credit Bank of Omaha v. L'HerissonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
- Bank of Union v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Merriam v. HuseltonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- First Nat. Bank of San Rafael v. Philippine Refining Corp. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.