Legal Opinion

Crockett v. Encino Gardens Care Center, Inc.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided December 10, 1971No. 699PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COWAN, judge.

Defendant appeals in this slip and fall case from a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff following trial before the court. Defendant asserts: (1) defendant was not negligent under New Mexico law; (2) the trial court erred in concluding that plaintiff did not assume the risk and was not contributorily negligent; (3) plaintiff failed to show by a preponderance of the evidence that the slip and fall aggravated a preexisting condition; and (4) defendant was prevented from introducing the testimony of a witness.

Although we decide the four issues on the merits, we note the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cave v. CaveNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Mozert v. NoedingNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Michael v. BaumanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Hughes v. Anchor Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Union News Co. v. FreebornOhio Supreme Court · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Trujillo v. TanuzNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. El Paso Electric v. Real Estate Mart, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Blacker v. U-Haul Co. of New Mexico, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Crockett v. Encino Gardens Care Center, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Encino Gardens Care Center, Inc. v. CrockettNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API