Crockett v. Encino Gardens Care Center, Inc.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COWAN, judge.
Defendant appeals in this slip and fall case from a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff following trial before the court. Defendant asserts: (1) defendant was not negligent under New Mexico law; (2) the trial court erred in concluding that plaintiff did not assume the risk and was not contributorily negligent; (3) plaintiff failed to show by a preponderance of the evidence that the slip and fall aggravated a preexisting condition; and (4) defendant was prevented from introducing the testimony of a witness.
Although we decide the four issues on the merits, we note the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cave v. CaveNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
- Mozert v. NoedingNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Michael v. BaumanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Hughes v. Anchor Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Union News Co. v. FreebornOhio Supreme Court · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Trujillo v. TanuzNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
- El Paso Electric v. Real Estate Mart, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- Blacker v. U-Haul Co. of New Mexico, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
- Crockett v. Encino Gardens Care Center, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
- Encino Gardens Care Center, Inc. v. CrockettNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.