Legal Opinion

Timely Products, Inc. v. Costanzo

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided February 1, 1979No. Civ. B-76-357PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

NEWMAN, District Judge.

In this declaratory judgment action, the plaintiffs, Hines and Timely Products, Inc., seek to invalidate the agreement by which the corporation contracted to pay defendant Costanzo royalties on sales of a product in return for an exclusive license to manufacture and sell the product. Although the contract, made before the product was patented, specified that royalties would be paid on sales whether or not the patent were later invalidated, plaintiffs ask this Court to declare that the agreement is unenforceable, and that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2008
  2. In Re the Estate of MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. In Re the Estate of MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  4. Yates v. Royal Consumer Products, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API