Legal Opinion
Carroll v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided November 23, 1910No. A-226PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Appeal from Canadian County Court; E. L. Fogg, Judge. Defendant was convicted for keeping a house of ill fame, and fined one hundred dollars. Defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
EURMAN, Presiding Judge.
The counsel for the defendant relies upon the following assignment of errors:
“(1) The evidence does not establish sufficient facts to constitute a public offense. (2) No crime is proved by the evidence. (3) The. verdict is «against the law. (4) The judgment is contrary to law. (5) The court erred in refusing to direct the jury to acquit the defendant. (6) The court erred in overruling the motion of the defendant for a new trial.”
These may all be considered under the general objection that the evidence is not sufficient to support the verdict.
C. E. Gunn testified that…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Ostendorf v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- Wilkerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Hurst v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
- Putman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.