Legal Opinion
Hurst v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided October 18, 1923No. A-4435PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBessey, J.
W. E. Hurst, plaintiff in error, for convenience designated the defendant, was charged jointly with Sadie Hnrst, his wife, with the unlawful possession of narcotic drugs. During the course of the trial the case was dismissed as to Sadie Hurst, and on January 20, 1922, a verdict of guilty was rendered against defendant "W. E. Hurst, fixing his punishment at a fine of $5,000 and confinement in the penitentiary for a period of seven years. From this judgment he appeals.
The crime charged is a felony. A deputy sheriff who had personal knowledge that certain persons were habitual users of narcotic…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kirk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
- Ostendorf v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- Proctor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Upton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
- Camp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
- Hull v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
- Hays v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
- Bunch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1932
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.