Legal Opinion

Mf Williams v. City and Cty. of Honolulu

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided August 31, 1982No. 7812PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

BURNS, C.J.

Plaintiff M. F. Williams, Inc. (Williams), appeals the summary judgment against it in favor of defendant City and County of Honolulu (City), third-party defendant Yasuo Arakaki (Arakaki), and fourth-party defendant Dames and Moore (D&M).

Sua sponte we note that the judgment did not resolve all claims as to all parties and that it was not made final as permitted by Rule 54(b), Hawaii Rules of Civil Procedure (1972) (HRCP). 1 Consequently, we hold that under Rule 54(b) it is not appealable and that we do not have jurisdiction to hear the appeal. Park v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Associated Engineers & Contractors, Inc. v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Sturkie v. HanHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. J. A. Thompson & Son, Inc. v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Employees' Retirement System v. Big Island Realty, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Park v. EsperanzaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & WrightHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Weinberg v. MauchHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Bank of Honolulu, NA v. AndersonHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Kohala Agriculture v. Deloitte & ToucheHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Littleton v. StateHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API