Legal Opinion

Krimmel v. Eielson

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1950No. 31454PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Daily

The plaintiffs, described as being residents, property owners, taxpayers and employees of the city of Springfield, started this action in the circuit court of Sangamon County against the defendants, the elected officials of the city and the clerk of the county, seeking a declaratory judgment in a controversy which had arisen over the construction of sections 39-1 and 39-2 of the Revised Cities and Villages Act, (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1949, chap. 24, pars. 39-1 and 39-2,) and section 162a of the Revenue Act, (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1949, chap. 120, par. 643a,) relative to the tax authorized in certain…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Park RidgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Merlo v. Johnston City & Big Muddy Coal & Mining Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1913
  3. S. Buchsbaum & Co. v. GordonIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  4. People Ex Rel. Martin v. Village of Oak ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Klemme v. Drainage District No. 5 of the Township of CreteIllinois Supreme Court · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Cason v. RingIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  2. BOARD OF EDUCATION, DISTRICT No. 6 v. NickellIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Mitsuuchi v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  4. People Ex Rel. Lunn v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1951
  5. State v. DevericksSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API