Legal Opinion

Merlo v. Johnston City & Big Muddy Coal & Mining Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1913PublishedCited by 48 opinions

Writ or Error to the Appellate Court for the Fourth District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Williamson county; the Hon.'W. W. Duncan, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Vickers

Francisca Merlo brought an action on the case against the Johnston City and Big Muddy Coal and Mining Company to recover damages resulting from the death of Frank Merlo, her husband, basing her right to recover on an alleged violation of sections 18 and 19 of the Mining law of 1899. A judgment for $1500 was recovered against the coal company, which has been affirmed by the Appellate Court for the Fourth District. The record has been brought to this court by a certiorari.

The declaration contains five counts, all of which are based on alleged violations of the statute. In the several counts of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Steamship Co. v. JoliffeSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  2. United States v. ClaflinSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. South Carolina v. GaillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Moore v. . MausertNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  5. Breitung v. LindauerMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Eitel v. LindheimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Orlicki v. McCarthyIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Certain Taxpayers v. SheahenIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Dworak v. TempelIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Puerto Rico Ilustrado, Inc. v. BuscagliaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1945

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API