Legal Opinion
North American Fire Insurance v. Zaenger
Illinois Supreme Court
Decided June 15, 1872PublishedCited by 16 opinions
Wbit oe Eeeob from the Circuit Court of St. Clair county; the Hon. Joseph Gillespie, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Walkeb
This was an action of assumpsit, brought by defendant in error in the St. Clair circuit court against plaintiff in error,, on a policy of insurance. The policy, amongst others, contained this condition:
“Or if during the continuance of this policy the above mentioned premises shall be occupied or used so as to increase the risk, or shall become vacant and unoccupied, or the risk be increased by the erection or occupation of neighboring buildings, or by any means whatever within the control of the assured, without the assent of this company endorsed hereon, etc. * * * then, and in every such…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Herrman v. . Merchants' Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Agricultural Insurance v. Hamilton ex rel. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
- Continental Insurance v. CoxIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
- Continental Insrance Co. of New York City v. KyleIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Schuermann v. Dwelling House InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.