Legal Opinion

Continental Insrance Co. of New York City v. Kyle

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1890No. 14,259PublishedCited by 22 opinions

From the Vigo Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBerkshire, C. J.

This was an action brought by the appellant to review a judgment obtained by the appellee against the appellant in an action upon an insurance policy issued by the appellant to the appellee, the said judgment having been obtained in the said Vigo Circuit Court.

The complaint rests upon the first branch of section 61.6, R. S. 1881. The court below sustained a demurrer to the complaint, and the appellant elected to abide by the ruling upon the demurrer, and judgment having been given for the appellee, this appeal is prosecuted.

The errors of law stated in the complaint are :

1st. The court erred…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ripley v. . the &198tna Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1864
  2. Herrman v. . Adriatic Fire Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Geo. Home Ins. v. Kinnier's adm'xSupreme Court of Virginia · 1877
  4. Levy v. ChittendenIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Ashworth v. Builders' Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Burnett v. MilnesIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Connecticut Fire Ins. v. BuchananCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  3. Agricultural Insurance v. Hamilton ex rel. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
  4. Germania Fire Insurance v. DeckardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Sumter Tobacco Warehouse Co. v. Phoenix Assurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API