Chaisson v. Adams
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtGrimes, J.
This is an appeal under RSA 282:5 from the decision of the appeal tribunal of the department of employment security which found plaintiff ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits. The plaintiff’s appeal petition stated that the appeal tribunal erred in holding him “ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits due [sic] his failing, without good cause, to apply for suitable work. This conclusion was based on facts which showed that the claimant was without transportation to contact prospective employers. Such a conclusion is erroneous as a matter of law.”
The defendant moved to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Putnam v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1961
- Mercer v. Merchants National BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
- Rafferty v. State, Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1966
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harkeem v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Griffin v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977