Legal Opinion
Kleeman v. Cadwell
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 20, 1987No. C4-87-686PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
Timothy Cadwell appeals the trial court’s judgment, claiming error in the application of the discount statute, Minn.Stat. § 604.07 (1986), enacted by the Minnesota legislature as part of the 1986 Tort Reform Act. Donna Kleeman also seeks review, claiming that the discount statute is unconstitutional. We affirm.
FACTS
This case was submitted to a jury on the issue of damages alone, with liability admitted. The jury found past pain and disability of $10,000 and future pain and disability of $30,000 over 30 years. During trial, the court denied Donna Kleeman’s motion to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. PfeiferSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Breimhorst v. BeckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Howard v. SanbornSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Val Robichaud and Thomas Robichaud v. Genevieve TheisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Rambaum v. SwisherCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Schreiner v. SchmitzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Kleeman v. CadwellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987