Application of Portland General Elec. Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1DissentBryson, J.
It is reasonable to conclude that petitioner Marbet’s right to challenge, through judicial review, the Energy Facility Siting Council’s (Council) final order is limited to the scope of his intervention; that the Court of Appeals usurped the Council’s function when it affirmatively appears that petitioner Marbet failed to present such contentions regarding standards to the Council, and the court nevertheless undertook to rule upon the sufficiency of the rules and standards pro*472mulgated by the Council. Christiansen did not petition this court for review of Marbet v. Portland Gen. Elect., 25 Or…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Nader v. AltermattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.