Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ray v. Oklahoma Furn. Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 25, 1934No. 23574Published

1DissentWelch, J.

(dissefiting). It is a fundamental principle that a plaintiff must establish his right to recover by competent evidence, and that before the plaintiff in any action may recover judgment, he must both allege and prove every fact essential to his right to recover judgment on the cause of action sought to be asserted.

In Davis v. Kelley, 96 Okla. 17, 219 P. 923, this court held in paragraph 1 of the syllabus:

“The burden of proof rests upon the parly having the affirmative as made by the pleadings, and such party must prove every essential fact necessary to establish his cause of action or…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Mason v. . HenryNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Mills v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Davis & YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Myers v. the First Presbyterian Church of PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
  5. Standard Marine Ins. Co., Ltd. v. Traders CompressSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API