Legal Opinion

Uppinghouse v. Mundel

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1885No. 12,079PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From the Floyd Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

Complaint by Calvin C.Uppinghouse against •Caroline Mundel for damages. A demurrer was sustained to the complaint, and there was final judgment against the plaintiff upon demurrer. This appeal is prosecuted upon the theory that the circuit court erred in holding the complaint to be insufficient upon demurrer.

The complaint charged that at the time of' the commission of the grievances complained of, the plaintiff, the defendant and the corporation kpown as the Louisville, New Albany and Chicago Railway Company, were each and all within the ■jurisdiction of the State of Indiana; that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pettit v. MercerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1847
  2. Harper v. KeysIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wilson v. JosephIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Helwig v. BecknerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Haines v. M. S. Welker & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  4. Indiana Bicycle Co. v. WillisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. Kestler v. KernIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API