Legal Opinion

Burton v. County of Abbeville

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 24, 1994No. 2126PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

Appellant, Edna Burton (Burton) requested a variance which was denied by the County’s Zoning Administrator. In an appeal to the respondent, County Zoning Board of Appeals (Board), the Board ruled Burton’s operation of a commercial motorcross racetrack was not a permitted use under the applicable county zoning ordinance and sustained the action of the administrator. The circuit court affirmed the decision of the Board. On appeal to this court, Burton argues: (1) the zoning ordinance is invalid and unenforceable, because the county has not adopted a comprehensive zoning plan; and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Biales v. YoungSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. Fairfield Ocean Ridge, Inc. v. Town of Edisto BeachCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  3. Godfrey v. HellerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  4. Bishop v. HightowerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  5. Capital View Fire District v. County of RichlandCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Miller v. City of CamdenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  2. State v. FrippCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  3. Johnson v. Hoechst Celanese Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  4. Dobyns v. South Carolina Department of Parks, Recreation & TourismSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  5. State v. SampsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API