Legal Opinion
Evanston Insurance v. G & T Fabricators, Inc.
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided October 2, 2009No. 709-CV-22-FLPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, Chief Judge.
This case comes now before the court upon motion to dismiss by defendants G & T Fabricators, Inc. (“G & T”) and Gary Spec (“Spec”) (DE #7), and motion to intervene by Allied Terminals, Inc. (“Allied”) (DE # 20). Both motions are ripe for ruling and, in part, raise corresponding issues for consideration. For the reasons set forth below, the motion to dismiss is denied and the motion to intervene, to which no response has been filed, is granted.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
On November 12, 2008, according to the pleadings, a tank containing liquid fertilizer upon…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal., County of MarinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Teague v. BakkerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- James H. Milligan v. Robert C. Anderson, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Continental Insurance v. Law Office of Thomas J. WalkerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1997
3Cited by2 opinions
- Evanston Insurance v. G & T Fabricators, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2010
- Central Cold Storage Corporation and National Custom Packing, Inc. v. Arch Specialty Insurance Company and Axis Surplus Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2026