State v. Wright
Oregon Supreme Court
Clatsop County. Plaintiff; appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtStrahan, J.
At the January term, 1886, of the circuit court of Clatsop County, defendants were indicted for the crime of selling spirituous liquors in less,quantities than one gal-*367Ion, without having first obtained a license therefor. The indictment sets out a license issued to the defendants by the city of Astoria, dated January 2, 1886, which purports to authorize them to sell spirituous liquors by retail in said city for one year, for which privilege they had paid the city of Astoria $200. The defendants demurred to this indictment for the following reasons:
First—The grand jury by which it was found…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Smails v. WhiteNebraska Supreme Court · 1876
- Fletcher v. OliverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1868
- People ex rel. Stewart v. Young Men's Father Matthew Total Abstinence Benevolent Society No. 1Michigan Supreme Court · 1879
- State ex rel. Troll v. HudsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Cutlip v. Sheriff of Calhoun CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1869
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Anderson v. RitterbuschSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Colby v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Warren v. CrosbyOregon Supreme Court · 1893
- People ex rel. Moore v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
- Hubbard v. LoweDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1915
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.