Legal Opinion

State v. Bullock

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 5, 1986No. 418A85PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BILLINGS, Justice.

The defendant brings forward four assignments of error. We agree with the defendant that he is entitled to a new trial because the trial judge did not comply with N.C.G.S. § 15A-1242 before allowing the defendant to be tried without counsel. Since the other issues, relating to evidentiary questions and remarks by the trial judge, are not likely to arise upon the new trial, we have chosen not to address those assignments of error.

The State’s evidence tended to show that the defendant engaged in fellatio with his two sons. The situation central to this appeal arose before…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. State v. ThackerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. McCrowreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. State v. BlakeneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  3. State v. PruittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  4. State v. DunlapSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. PenaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API