State v. Dunlap
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BILLINGS, Chief Justice.
The defendant brings forward four assignments of error. He contends that he is entitled to a new trial because the trial judge failed to conduct the mandatory inquiry under N.C.G.S. § ISA-1242 before allowing his request to remove his appointed counsel and represent himself; that the trial judge committed reversible error in admitting testimony about an inculpatory statement by defendant without first conducting a voir dire hearing to determine admissibility; that the admission of incompetent evidence about the weapon used in the crime prejudiced his case; and that he…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. ThackerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. FreelandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. PruittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. SorrowCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- In Re WatsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- State v. StanbackCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.