Legal Opinion

State v. Dunlap

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 7, 1986No. 145A86PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BILLINGS, Chief Justice.

The defendant brings forward four assignments of error. He contends that he is entitled to a new trial because the trial judge failed to conduct the mandatory inquiry under N.C.G.S. § ISA-1242 before allowing his request to remove his appointed counsel and represent himself; that the trial judge committed reversible error in admitting testimony about an inculpatory statement by defendant without first conducting a voir dire hearing to determine admissibility; that the admission of incompetent evidence about the weapon used in the crime prejudiced his case; and that he…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. State v. ThackerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. State v. FreelandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. State v. PruittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. SorrowCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. In Re WatsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  5. State v. StanbackCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API