Medina-Chimal v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT **
2Per curiam
Javier Medina-Chimal is an alien without status. He moved for a continuance of his removal proceedings so that he could pursue various avenues of relief. The immigration judge (IJ) denied his request, finding there was no evidence that he was eligible for relief from removal and entered an order of removal. The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirmed, and Medina-Chimal now seeks review in this court.
Exercising jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a), we DENY his petition for review.
I. Background
Medina-Chimal, a native and citizen of Mexico, entered the United States…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Garrett v. Selby Connor Maddux & JanerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Becker v. KrollCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Uanreroro v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Sarr v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- Ramiro Tula Rubio v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Ramiro Tula Rubio v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015