Legal Opinion

Baird Bros. v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 11, 1917PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Louisa District Court. — Oscar Hale, Judge. Action at law brought by plaintiffs, who are stock shippers, for damages for refusal of defendant company to furnish cars to ship stock from the town of Marsh, Iowa, to Chicago. Plaintiffs allege they were compelled to keep the cattle in the stockyards of defendant for some time at expense, to their damage in the sum of $200. The case was tried to the court without a jury, upon an agreed statement of facts.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Louisa District Court. — Oscar Hale, Judge. Action at law brought by plaintiffs, who are stock shippers, for damages for refusal of defendant company to furnish cars to ship stock from the town of Marsh, Iowa, to Chicago. Plaintiffs allege they were compelled to keep the cattle in the stockyards of defendant for some time at expense, to their damage in the sum of $200. The case was tried to the court without a jury, upon an agreed statement of facts. The court found for plaintiff, and rendered judgment against defendant for tlie sum of $200. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

The petition alleges, in substance, that plaintiffs are stock shippers, and that on Monday, June 10, 1912, they gave notice to the agent of defendant at Marsh, Iowa, and ordered two cars to be furnished to the plaintiffs at defendant’s station at Marsh, Iowa, for Wednesday, June 12, 1912, for the shipment of 52 head of cattle; that plaintiffs had no notice from defendant or its agent that said cars would not be furnished at said time, or that the said cattle would not be taken by defendant for shipment on that day; that, at about 8 or 9 o’clock in the morning of June 12, plaintiffs delivered…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Mondou v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Pennsylvania Railroad v. International Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Puritan Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. Kalo Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. Linwood Stone Products Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  3. Kalo Brick & Tile Co. v. Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 1979
  4. Williston Coal & Ice Co. v. DavisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Miller v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API