Legal Opinion

Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. Linwood Stone Products Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 14, 1965No. 51847PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarfield, C. J.

In these two consolidated law actions by the Rock Island and Milwaukee Railroads respectively, to recover demurrage on cars furnished Linwood Stone Products Company, Inc., the answer contained a counterclaim based on the railroad’s alleged failure to furnish clean cars. On plaintiffs’ applications for adjudication of law points under rule 105, Rules of Civil Procedure, the trial court ruled it was without jurisdiction to entertain the counterclaims and dismissed them. Defendant has appealed.

Bach plaintiff filed a reply to the counterclaim against it although the Rock Island’s reply is…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Slocum v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Puritan Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. LindellSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Loomis v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Illinois Central Railroad v. Mulberry Hill Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rouse v. RouseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  2. Schulte v. MauerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  3. Kalo Brick & Tile Co. v. Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 1979
  4. Julian Jay Toney v. Hazel Parker, Arthur Parker and the Arthur E. Parker and Hazel Frances Parker Trust Dated 05/26/1993Supreme Court of Iowa · 2021
  5. Schulte v. MauerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API