Brost v. State Medical Board

This case arises out of a disciplinary action that appellant, the State Medical Board of Ohio, brought against appellee. In October 1987, the board notified appellee that the board was consid*447ering taking disciplinary action against appellee in regard to appellee's treatment of "patient 1." In July 1988, a hearing examiner of the board held an evidentiary hearing in the matter. The hearing examiner's report found that, from August 20, 1984 through September 12,1987, appellee prescribed substantial amounts of assorted Schedule II, Schedule III, and Schedule IV controlled substanced to patient…