Legal Opinion

Raben v. Schlottman

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1958No. File 9654PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

Defendant Buford 0. Schlottman and three associates entered into a contract denominated “Contract of Organization of the Tepee Buttes Joint Venture”. It was set forth in the contract that the purpose for which the joint adventure was organized was to acquire leases and to prospect for oil and gas. The transactions herein arose out of drilling operations in Butte County, South Dakota. The drilling of a well was abandoned by these persons because of the collapse of the casing, and this resulted in the commencement of an action by them in the United States District Court for the District of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rutland Savings Bank v. SteeleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  2. Illinois National Oil & Gas Co. v. SinclairIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Hammer v. SandersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
  4. Spur Bottling Co. v. Canada Dry Ginger Ale, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1951

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. South Dakota State Cement Plant Commission v. Wausau Underwriters Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Amdahl v. LoweSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Wessington Springs Education Ass'n v. Wessington Springs School District 36-2South Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. DeHaven v. HallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Yarcheski v. ReinerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API