Legal Opinion

Hydro-Line Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1958No. 34808PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Davis

This case poses the question of whether the injuries of Darwin Brenbarger, herein called respondent, arose out of and in the course of his employment. The arbitrator found they did not, but his decision was reversed by the Industrial Commission which entered an award for temporary total disability and for permanent loss of use of 20 per cent of the right leg. On writ of certiorari, the circuit court of Winnebago County affirmed the Industrial Commission and we allowed the petition for writ of error.

There is no dispute concerning the material facts. Respondent, age 19, was employed by…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Eugene Dietzen Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Matter of Wilson v. General Motors Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Jewel Tea Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Corn Products Refining Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Christian v. Chicago & Illinois Midland Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Tocci v. Tessler & Weiss, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  2. Lybrand, Ross Bros. & Montgomery v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Williams v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Wise v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Inland Steel Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1959

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API