Legal Opinion

Trucken v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 7, 1939PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

“Waterhead Mills, Inc. and/or Waterside Mills, Inc., ” the employer of William Trucken, insured his life with the defendant under a so called group policy in the sum of $1,000. One promise of the defendant was “upon receipt at its home office in the city of New York, within one year from the date hereof, or within one year from the date of any renewal hereof, of due proof of the death of any such employee while insured hereunder, to pay at such home office to the beneficiary as designated by the employee the amount for which such employee is hereby insured . . . .” The policy was dated…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Emerick v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  3. Palumbo v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. New England Mutual Life Insurance v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  5. Shea v. Aetna Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. King v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  2. Uptegrove v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Azevedo v. Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  4. Howard Verlo v. The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  5. Jimmy's Diner, Inc. v. Liquor Liability Joint Underwriting Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API