Legal Opinion

Henard v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 16, 1904No. 2939PublishedCited by 15 opinions

The opinion sufficiently states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HEUDERSOH, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of rape, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of twenty-five years.

There are two bills of exception which raise practically the same question. These relate to the proof of other acts of intercourse than that alleged in the indictment, and for which appellant was tried. When prosecutrix, Luna Wilson, was first placed on the stand, the State proved by her an act of intercourse occurring during the spring of 1903, about com planting time; and this was the transaction relied on by the State for the conviction. The State…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893
  2. McCandless v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
  3. Trotter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  4. Bluman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Waldo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Kidwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1912
  3. Hunt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Gross v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. Norton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API