Legal Opinion

Joseph K. Majko v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 16, 1972No. 71-1357PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

On April 24, 1970, petitioner pleaded guilty to violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 7 and 13. The date is important, because it was more than one year after the Supreme Court’s decision setting out guidelines for the acceptance of guilty pleas per Rule 11, Fed.R.Crim.P. McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459, 89 S.Ct. 1166, 22 L.Ed.2d 418 (1969).

We believe it is our duty to review the record for compliance with Rule 11, although petitioner did not specifically raise the McCarthy issue in his pro se § 2255 petition (nor did the U.S. Attorney call it to our attention). United States v. Briscoe, 428…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. United States v. James CodyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  5. Joseph Fields v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Bolivar Irizarry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  2. Michael Joseph Paradiso and Anthony Richard Bonnacci v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Commonwealth v. MinorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. United States v. Melvin C. WetterlinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API