Legal Opinion

In Re Xeller

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided September 16, 1999No. 14-98-01190-CVPublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAURICE E. AMIDEI, Justice.

This consolidated mandamus proceeding involves a discovery dispute arising out of a workers’ compensation lawsuit. Rela-tors, Charles Xeller, M.D., Medical Evaluation Specialists, Inc. (“MES”) and Highlands Casualty Company (“Highlands”) complain about the appointment of a master and various aspects of the court’s discovery order. 1 We conclude that relators’ complaint about the master is barred by laches, but that the court’s discovery order of September 15, 1998, exceeds the scope of proper discovery. Therefore, we conditionally grant mandamus relief in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Universe Life Insurance v. GilesTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. In Re American Optical Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Rivercenter Associates v. RiveraTexas Supreme Court · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. In Re Jim Walter Homes, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
  2. Estate of Regis v. Harris County Hospital District, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
  3. Reiff v. Roy, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
  4. James v. KloosCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  5. In Re Boehme, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API