Legal Opinion

Francis Faraola v. Jack O'Neill and the Yacht Marie Celine

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 26, 1978No. 77-1886PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BONSAL, District Judge:

Appellant Francis Faraola instituted this maritime action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California seeking to recover damages from the appellees, the yacht MARIE CELINE and its owner Jack O’Neill. Appellant contends that the IOV2 months he was required to spend in a Mexican jail came about by reason of the unseaworthiness of the MARIE CELINE and abandonment. The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of appellees. This appeal followed. We affirm.

In the spring of 1975, appellee Jack O’Neill enlisted the appellant and his…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Mahnich v. Southern Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Waldron v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ribitzki v. Canmar Reading & Bates, Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. Mylonakis v. The M/T Georgios M.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
  3. Wuestewald v. Foss Maritime Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
  4. Ribitzki v. Canmar Reading & Bates, Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. Murray v. HuntDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API