Legal Opinion

Royal v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 12, 1969No. 42320PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is possession of heroin with a prior conviction for an offense of the same nature alleged for enhancement; the punishment, 25 years.

The brief submitted by appellant’s most capable court appointed attorney concedes that his case will stand or fall on appeal on the question of the validity of the search warrant and the subsequent search.

The affidavit is identical in all material respects to that which we upheld in Brown v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 437 S.W.2d 829, certiorari denied, 393 U.S. 1089, 89 S.Ct. 850, 21 L.Ed.2d 782, and we adhere to our holding in that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Rugendorf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Bosley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Acosta v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1966
  5. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Curtis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Pecina v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. Ware v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  5. Zabala v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API