Legal Opinion
Ryals v. Canales
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided March 6, 1989No. 05-88-01398-CVPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROWE, Justice.
Relators Michael W. Ryals and Suzanne Hart (collectively “Ryals”) and Mazda Motor Corporation and Transnational Motors, Inc. (collectively “Mazda”) bring this petition for writ of mandamus to compel the Honorable Adolph Canales, Judge of the 298th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas, to vacate an order directing Ryals to produce for the real party in interest, Guy McRoberts, those documents which Ryals and Mazda claim are protected by the “joint defense” privilege. We conditionally grant the writ.
This is the second mandamus proceeding arising from the underlying…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Peeples v. Honorable Fourth Supreme Judicial DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Weisel Enterprises, Inc. v. CurryTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Barnes v. WhittingtonTexas Supreme Court · 1988
- Lee W. Hunydee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Roberts v. Carrier Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re EI DuPont De Nemours and Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
- Aiken v. Texas Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1993
- Rio Hondo Implement Co. v. Euresti, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1995
- Boston Auction Co. v. Western Farm Credit BankDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1996
- Hyundai Motor America v. O'NEILL, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.