Legal Opinion

Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Nittoli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 12, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly Cohen, J.), entered September 30, 1997, which denied appellant successful bidders’ motion to set aside a foreclosure sale and compel return of their down payment deposited with the Referee, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Sale of the premises subject to unpaid taxes and assessments was not a violation of RPAPL 1354 (2) since the judgment of foreclosure so provided. Even if it were such a violation, appellants had notice of such condition and therefore cannot claim prejudice (RPAPL 231 [6]; cf., Aaron v Kent, 182 AD2d 960). Nor should the sale…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. BocciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  2. Aaron v. KentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cashin v. SimekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Better Homes Depot, Inc. v. KrautAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Merrill Lynch Credit Corp. v. AverellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API