Legal Opinion

Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Boccia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 25, 1935PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHagarty, J.

The plaintiff, by notice of motion in this foreclosure action, applied for confirmation of the referee’s report of sale and for leave to enter a deficiency judgment for $1,200.47 against the defendant, respondent, Michael Boccia, and defendant Mary Boccia. Plaintiff’s motion was made and heard within ninety days after the delivery of the referee’s deed, but more than ninety days after the property was offered at public auction by the referee. Defendant Michael Boccia opposed the application, in so far as request was made for a deficiency judgment, on the grounds, first, that the application…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Feiber Realty Corp. v. AbelNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. New York Life Insurance v. H. & J. Guttag Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1934

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re SmithUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 1980
  2. In re HuieNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. NittoliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Cohn v. Freshwater Wetlands Appeals BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Municipal Mortgage Co. v. Syndic Realty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API