Legal Opinion
State v. Fiorenzo
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 2, 1996No. 94-T-5172PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Joseph E. Mahoney, Presiding Judge.
The following appeal arises from a bench trial before the Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas finding appellant, James Fiorenzo, guilty of theft in office, complicity to theft in office, and four counts of forgery. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.
In January 1993, appellant began his term as the Trumbull County Engineer, having been newly elected to the position in November 1992. Soon after taking office, appellant began seeking information about the process that he needed to follow in order to remodel the Trumbull County Engineer’s Office.
During…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Hanamura-Valashinas v. Transitions by Firenza, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. EcholsOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
- Pollock v. Associated Public, 06ca8 (4-9-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. TrammellOhio Court of Appeals · 2013