Hartis v. . Electric R. R.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, J., dissenting; WALKER, J., concurring in dissenting opinion. It is alleged that Maggie J. Hartis was injured by the negligence of the defendant on 24 May, 1910, and soon thereafter the said Maggie J. Hartis and her husband commenced an action against the defendant to recover damages for the injury.
During the pendency of that action the deposition of the said Maggie J. Hartis was regularly taken and filed, and thereafter the said Maggie J. Hartis died.
This action was then commenced by J. M. Hartis, as administrator of his wife, to recover damages for her wrongful death, caused, as the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. StoutIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. HengstCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
- Miller v. GillispieWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
- Andricus' Adm'r v. Pineville Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
- Watson v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
3Cited by9 opinions
- Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Reid Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Thomas v. DauesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
- Tieffenbrun v. . FlannerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Tieffenbrun v. FlannerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Mid-City Bank & Trust Co. v. Reading Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.