Legal Opinion
Rawson v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided February 10, 1988No. Civ. A. 81-K-1454PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON SEARS’ MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT
KANE, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought suit against Sears, Roebuck and Company alleging his employment was terminated as a result of age discrimination. Judgment in favor of plaintiff in both liability and damage trials was reversed on appeal. On remand, judgment was entered for Sears in accordance with the order of the Tenth Circuit and each party was directed to pay his or its own costs. Order of October 13, 1987.
Sears filed a $45,000 bill of costs with the clerk of the district court for costs incurred on appeal, mainly expenses for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Delano v. KitchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Baez v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Howard R. HughesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Darlene GUSE Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. J. C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Douglas D. Church, Doing Business as Modern SpecialistCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Northern Elec. Co. v. PhillipsMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
- McKelvy v. Metal Container Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1989
- BSAF AG v. Great American Assurance Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
- Northern Electric Company v. Bertis PhillipsMississippi Supreme Court · 1991