Legal Opinion
Darlene GUSE Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. J. C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 3, 1978No. 76-1064 and 76-1172PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PELL, Circuit Judge.
Following the issuance of the court’s opinion in this case, the plaintiffs-appellees filed their petition for rehearing with a suggestion that the rehearing be en banc, which petition raised two principal points, the first being with regard to the assessment of costs against the unsuccessful parties on appeal, which appears to be the matter of principal concern to the appellees, and the second being that the plaintiffs on remand should be permitted to amend their complaint to advance a theory, which they assert would be permissible under General Electric Co. v. Gilbert,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Eugene M. Fuhrer v. Malcolm W. FuhrerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
- Asher v. RuppaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Howard R. HughesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Berner v. British Commonwealth Pacific Airlines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Hung Hy Nguyen Dba Mekong Market v. United States of America, Raymond Bertrand Dba Ray's Groceries v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Wakeen v. Hoffman House, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Republic Tobacco Company v. North Atlantic Trading Company, Inc., North Atlantic Operating Company, Inc., and National Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Jones v. Town of WaylandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Tung Mung Development Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.