Legal Opinion
Pronk v. City of Rochester
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided January 21, 2025No. 0:22-cv-03090Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Curtis Pronk, Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM OF LAW AND ORDER Civil File No. 22-3090 (MJD/SGE) City of Rochester; Erik Kerska, individually and in his official capacity; Vance Swisher, individually and in his official capacity; and Linda Hillenbrand, individually and in her official capacity, Defendants. Stephen C. Fiebiger, Stephen C. Fiebiger Law Office, Counsel for Plaintiff. Andrew A. Wolf and Susan M. Tindal, Iverson Reuvers Condon, Counsel for Defendant. I. INTRODUCTION This lawsuit arises from an employment dispute between Plaintiff Curtis…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.