Legal Opinion

BP Exploration & Oil Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 28, 2000No. 97-648 TPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Senior Judge.

This tax refund case is before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment and plaintiffs cross-motion for partial summary judgment. The issue is the proper interpretation of former section 4988 of the Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.), 26 U.S.C. §. 4988 (1982 & Supp. III 1985).1 For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion is ^anted and Plaintiffs motion is denied

BACKGROUND

The relevant facts in this case are not in dispute. Plaintiff, BP Exploration & Inc., seeks refunds of windfall profit tax (WPT) paid for all taxable quarters of 1984…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  5. Watt v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Overseas Thread Industries, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  2. BP Exploration & Oil Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API