BP Exploration & Oil Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Senior Judge.
This tax refund case is before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment and plaintiffs cross-motion for partial summary judgment. The issue is the proper interpretation of former section 4988 of the Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.), 26 U.S.C. §. 4988 (1982 & Supp. III 1985).1 For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion is ^anted and Plaintiffs motion is denied
BACKGROUND
The relevant facts in this case are not in dispute. Plaintiff, BP Exploration & Inc., seeks refunds of windfall profit tax (WPT) paid for all taxable quarters of 1984…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Watt v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Overseas Thread Industries, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- BP Exploration & Oil Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001