Woods v. State

OPINION

ODOM, Judge.

This appeal is from a conviction for the offense of robbery by assault. The punishment was assessed by a jury at 75 years.1

*669Appellant brings two grounds of error. First, he contends: “The trial court erred when it allowed testimony identifying appellant which was based on pictures shown the complaining witness in a suggestive manner over appellant’s objection.”

Celestus Smith testified that he was lying down inside his residence in Dallas at approximately 4:00 P.M. on June 14, 1970, when the appellant and Andrew Brown “ . . . broke in the room and just run in there and one…