Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Douglas School District No. 4

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1984No. CA A21227; SC 29156PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, C. J.

An elementary school teacher, Ramona Pierce, claims that she was improperly dismissed from her employment. The Fair Dismissal Appeals Board (FDAB), which is the body charged with handling appeals from teacher dismissals, ORS 342.905, found that Pierce had resigned and therefore had not been dismissed from her employment. She appealed to the Court of Appeals, which reversed and remanded, holding that Pierce’s written letter of resignation was ineffective, that the school district’s actions constituted a “defacto dismissal,” and that the FDAB had jurisdiction. 60 Or App 285, 653 P2d 243 (1982).…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Armistead v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Grider v. TurnbowOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Financial Indemnity Co. v. BevansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  4. Harlow v. Oregonian Publishing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Pierce v. Douglas School District No. 4Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hughes v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Warren v. Buncombe County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Siler v. TurnbullCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. USI Insurance Services, LLC v. AitkinDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2022
  5. Warren v. Buncombe County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API